Looking forward, while looking back and spinning while standing in place.
Friday, July 30, 2010
Swing on the Spiral
Posted by JP at 5:31 PM 0 comments
Labels: chip, fellowship, term 2, term 3
Monday, May 10, 2010
The Neuro of Music
Great post over at the Nature Blog network on the neuroscience of music and pleasure:
"Why do we enjoy music? Well, simply put, research shows that music elicits a number of physiological changes including increased release of dopamine from neurons originating in the ventral tegmental area, a mid-brain structure associated with the emotional reward [1]. This reward for music that we enjoy evokes an autonomic response subjectively referred to as "shivers down the spine." [2]. This is a robust and highly reproducible phenomenon."
I will have to catch up on those papers, but it is really interesting that the "shivers down the spine" you get from really good music is a real, physiological phenomenom. Makes sense. And if you've never felt it, you need to get some better music! Also note the parahippocampus is NOT correlated with pleasure, which makes sense considering it's proximity to the amygdala (fear response center). It also makes me wonder how people with Parkinson's experience music later in the course of their disease considering the lack of dopamine...
Posted by JP at 8:08 AM 0 comments
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Physio Testes
Or how Dr. H made physiology fun through corny jokes:
"We know that increased heat decreases the viabilty and production of sperm. Studies have shown that men sitting crosslegged with their laptop (on laps) the testicle closer to the laptop (hotter) produces less. Another quick way mentioned is to see if the male wears tightie whities. If so, tell him to change to boxers.... now, if you don't believe me consider this: ever seen batman? does batman have children? I rest my case."
Posted by JP at 9:24 AM 0 comments
Friday, April 30, 2010
Ingrown Toenails and Funny Bones
Distractable has a great post on the relevance of Physics to clinical practice - it's on old post but a good one and it came back to mind cause a friend got an ingrown toenail. Dr. Rob (distractable) discusses the physics of ingrown toenails and also gives us the following clinical rules (yes, this is on the USMLE):
This is why the presence of an ingrown toenail, which is evidence of a hyper-gravitational podiatric state, is invariably accompanied by the following:
People step on them – scientists have proven that a foot with an ingrown nail is 10 times more likely to be stepped on than those without.
Heavy objects are kicked – careful analysis has shown that objects such as coffee tables, lamps, and even large appliances move into the path of a person with an ingrown nail.
I would like to add to this the Ulnar Rule, which is observed by anyone who has taken Anatomy. Once you learn that the Ulnar nerve (or mulnar as some like to call it) is in fact your "funny bone" you are doomed to a life of hitting it at least once a week. What was once an annual event is now a regular part of your life. Thank you Gross Anatomy.
That's all for now - time to get back to Renal.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Renal Yellow Highlighter
It seems appropriate doesn't it? What's not appropriate is how ridiculously behind I am in Physio and how I can see a train wreck of finals ahead.... if I can only switch tracks...thank big bellied buddha there is no more no material for Neuro.
Immuno... still no news on that front and no idea how I did. I'll take a pass at this point. grade just came out on Angel - and I'm happy with it. An improvement from my terrible midterm performance and keeps my GPA intact - phew! I still can't stand Dr. S though and am contemplating doing DES to alleviate the misery of others...
Also, I need some new study music. Non-lyrical music is of course key, but I've been listening to Coltrane, Air, Trainspotting/Primal Scream and Theivary Corporation way too much. Yeah I got some Yo Yo Ma in there too, but really there must be something else out there to sooth my studying brain, but I can't seem to find the time to find it. If you have suggestions, lemme know - I preciates it.
Posted by JP at 7:20 AM 0 comments
Monday, April 26, 2010
Immuno Rage
I cannot quite remember any class that has inspired such rage. It was not the material itself, which I liked, or even the obscure clinical trials, some of which were interesting but mostly boiled down to: oops, this TNF blocker for rheumatoid arthritis gives you cancer (which the FDA didn't spot until after it was approved) or uh-oh, looks like you can get progressive leukoencephalopathy from your psoriasis meds (all of which convinced me to tell everyone I know to stay away from Phase 1 and 2 trials).
I also feel like a good chunk of immunology is guesswork - we know how certain things interact and many of the big players, but ultimately it's an extermely complex system that we're just scratching the surface of. And when we mess with one thing, say nTregs, the consequences are often unexpected and vary widely from model organisms. There are many diseases that people are suffering from today and I do sympathize with the urgency to develop drugs to help them even with incomplete info. I guess that is part of the challenge of medicine: sometimes it means operating on partial info in desperate situations, especially with cancer and painful, chronic diseases.
But anyway, what really got me about this course was the questions! For some reason the way these questions were worded and presented with the material just burned me up! I have not felt this angry at a class before. I can maybe blame the heat, or that I needed on object at which to focus my unspecified rage (Dr. S), but I don't know. After the exam there were the typical discussions about questions and complaints about the course. I managed to distill my issues into two main points:
- The material was presented poorly from the beginning without a big picture, proper diagrams, or any good interconnection and context. We were expected to straight up memorize random letters and names with little info for how they interacted and that just don't work for me!
- There were major inconsistencies between the material presented in class, the notes provided and the lack of a real textbook meant we went shopping for various sources (purple book, white book, red book, brown book, HY, wikipedia) many of which gave conflicting info about basic topics (like HLAs that never showed up on the exam btw)
Posted by JP at 12:20 PM 0 comments
Labels: immunology, rage, SGU, term 2